Editorial Standards

Accuracy first. Comfort optional. Clickbait rejected at the door.

1. Evidence Before Narrative

We do not start with "the story we want to tell" and then search for supporting fragments. We start with signals, constraints, and trade-offs, then write the argument.

2. Original Framing, Not Content Repackaging

We do not rewrite trending threads and call it "research." If a topic is crowded, we publish only when we have a distinct angle, stronger framing, or better decision utility.

3. India-First Specificity

Advice that works in San Francisco can fail in Bengaluru for very boring and very real reasons: salary bands, notice periods, labor competition, city costs, and company mix. We optimize for local relevance.

4. Decision Utility Over Motivation

5. Correction Protocol

If an error is found, we fix it, log meaningful changes, and update the reality-check date. "Quiet edits" that change conclusions without acknowledgment are not acceptable.

6. Commercial Firewall

Editorial and sponsorship decisions are separated. If a sponsor wants editorial influence, the answer is straightforward: no.

Reference: Revenue Model and Sponsorship Policy.

7. AI Use Policy

8. Tone Policy

We use dry satire to expose nonsense, not to insult readers. If a line is funny but reduces clarity, it gets removed.

9. Update Cadence

10. Reader Contract

We owe you clarity, provenance, and correction discipline. You owe yourself one thing: do not outsource your career decisions to a single post, including ours.

Quality Gate

If a draft is not specific, useful, and verifiable, it does not ship. "Good enough for publishing" is not a quality standard.

Last updated: February 22, 2026

Calculator
Reality Check
Layoff Radar
Salary Drop